Brief Summary
To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Perceval S heart valve when used to replace a diseased or dysfunctional aortic valve or aortic valve prosthesis.
Brief Title
Perceval S Aortic Heart Valve Study- North America
Detailed Description
This investigation is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center trial of the PERCEVAL valve implanted in patients requiring aortic valve replacement. The study will be conducted in a maximum of 25 centers in the United States. Patients will be evaluated at each of the following time intervals:preoperative, at implant, in the early postoperative period, in the late postoperative period (between 3 and 6 months postoperatively), at 1 year (between 11 and 13 months postoperatively), and annually until study completion. The duration of the study is anticipated to be 5 years.
Categories
Completion Date
Completion Date Type
Estimated
Conditions
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Aortic Valve Stenosis With Insufficiency
Regurgitation, Aortic Valve
Aortic Valve Incompetence
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
1. Subjects of age \>= 18 years.
2. Subjects with aortic valve stenosis or steno-insufficiency.
3. The subject is willing to sign the informed consent.
4. The subject in which preoperative evaluation indicated the need for native or prosthetic aortic valve replacement.
5. The subject is located in a geographic location that will enable the subject to return to the study site for all follow-up examinations (i.e. geographically stable).
6. Subject will be available to the investigator(s) for postoperative follow-up beyond one year.
Exclusion criteria:
1. The subject has preexisting valve prosthesis or annuloplasty ring in the mitral, pulmonic or tricuspid position.
2. The subject requires a double or multiple valve replacement or repair of the mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonic valve.
3. The subject has a previously implanted PERCEVAL valve that requires replacement.
4. Subjects requiring simultaneous cardiac procedures, apart from septal myectomy and/or coronary by-pass.
5. The subject has active endocarditis.
6. Subjects with active myocarditis
7. The subject is or will be participating in a concomitant research study of an investigational product.
8. Subjects with aneurysmal dilation or dissection of the ascending aortic wall.
9. The subject is a minor, drug abuser, alcohol abuser, prison inmate, institutionalized, or is unable to give informed consent.
10. The subject has a major or progressive non-cardiac disease that, in the investigator's experience, results in a life expectancy of less than 1 year, or the implant of the device produces an unacceptable increased risk to the patient.
11. Subjects with known hypersensitivity to nickel alloys.
12. The subject is undergoing renal dialysis for chronic renal failure or has hyperparathyroidism.
13. The subject has had an acute preoperative neurological deficit, myocardial infarction, or cardiac event that has not returned to baseline or stabilized ≥30 days prior to the planned valve implant surgery.
14. Subject is known to be noncompliant or is unlikely to complete the study.
15. Subjects with an aortic root enlargement, where the ratio between the diameter of the sino-tubular junction and the annulus diameter, assessed by TTE, is \> 1.3.
1. Subjects of age \>= 18 years.
2. Subjects with aortic valve stenosis or steno-insufficiency.
3. The subject is willing to sign the informed consent.
4. The subject in which preoperative evaluation indicated the need for native or prosthetic aortic valve replacement.
5. The subject is located in a geographic location that will enable the subject to return to the study site for all follow-up examinations (i.e. geographically stable).
6. Subject will be available to the investigator(s) for postoperative follow-up beyond one year.
Exclusion criteria:
1. The subject has preexisting valve prosthesis or annuloplasty ring in the mitral, pulmonic or tricuspid position.
2. The subject requires a double or multiple valve replacement or repair of the mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonic valve.
3. The subject has a previously implanted PERCEVAL valve that requires replacement.
4. Subjects requiring simultaneous cardiac procedures, apart from septal myectomy and/or coronary by-pass.
5. The subject has active endocarditis.
6. Subjects with active myocarditis
7. The subject is or will be participating in a concomitant research study of an investigational product.
8. Subjects with aneurysmal dilation or dissection of the ascending aortic wall.
9. The subject is a minor, drug abuser, alcohol abuser, prison inmate, institutionalized, or is unable to give informed consent.
10. The subject has a major or progressive non-cardiac disease that, in the investigator's experience, results in a life expectancy of less than 1 year, or the implant of the device produces an unacceptable increased risk to the patient.
11. Subjects with known hypersensitivity to nickel alloys.
12. The subject is undergoing renal dialysis for chronic renal failure or has hyperparathyroidism.
13. The subject has had an acute preoperative neurological deficit, myocardial infarction, or cardiac event that has not returned to baseline or stabilized ≥30 days prior to the planned valve implant surgery.
14. Subject is known to be noncompliant or is unlikely to complete the study.
15. Subjects with an aortic root enlargement, where the ratio between the diameter of the sino-tubular junction and the annulus diameter, assessed by TTE, is \> 1.3.
Inclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
1. Subjects of age \>= 18 years.
2. Subjects with aortic valve stenosis or steno-insufficiency.
3. The subject is willing to sign the informed consent.
4. The subject in which preoperative evaluation indicated the need for native or prosthetic aortic valve replacement.
5. The subject is located in a geographic location that will enable the subject to return to the study site for all follow-up examinations (i.e. geographically stable).
6. Subject will be available to the investigator(s) for postoperative follow-up beyond one year.
1. Subjects of age \>= 18 years.
2. Subjects with aortic valve stenosis or steno-insufficiency.
3. The subject is willing to sign the informed consent.
4. The subject in which preoperative evaluation indicated the need for native or prosthetic aortic valve replacement.
5. The subject is located in a geographic location that will enable the subject to return to the study site for all follow-up examinations (i.e. geographically stable).
6. Subject will be available to the investigator(s) for postoperative follow-up beyond one year.
Gender
All
Gender Based
false
Keywords
aortic valve replacement
aortic stenosis
aortic steno-insufficiency
Perceval
Sutureless aortic heart valve
Healthy Volunteers
No
Last Update Post Date
Last Update Post Date Type
Estimated
Last Update Submit Date
Minimum Age
18 Years
NCT Id
NCT01810679
Org Class
Industry
Org Full Name
Sorin Group USA, Inc.
Org Study Id
G120053
Overall Status
Terminated
Phases
Not Applicable
Primary Completion Date
Primary Completion Date Type
Actual
Official Title
Clinical Investigation of the Perceval S Sutureless Heart Valve
Primary Outcomes
Outcome Description
To demonstrate that the complication and survival rates for the PERCEVAL S valve are comparable to appropriate historical controls manifested as objective performance criteria (OPCs) and to that reported for other stented bioprostheses in the literature
Outcome Measure
Primary Safety Endpoint
Outcome Time Frame
One-year
Outcome Description
To demonstrate that the rate of valve success for the PERCEVAL S valve is comparable to that of appropriate historical controls
Outcome Measure
Primary Efficacy Endpoint
Outcome Time Frame
One-year
Secondary Outcomes
Outcome Description
To demonstrate that the hemodynamic performance of the PERCEVAL S valve is comparable to that reported in the literature for other stented aortic bioprostheses
Outcome Time Frame
One-year
Outcome Measure
Secondary Efficacy Outcomes
Outcome Description
To demonstrate clinically significant improvements in overall patient condition by comparison of preoperative and postoperative NYHA functional classifications
Outcome Time Frame
One-year
Outcome Measure
Secondary Efficacy Outcomes
Outcome Description
To demonstrate that the rate of device technical success for the PERCEVAL S valve is comparable to that of appropriate historical controls
Outcome Time Frame
One-year
Outcome Measure
Secondary Efficacy Outcomes
Start Date
Status Verified Date
First Post Date
First Post Date Type
Estimated
First Submit Date
First Submit QC Date
Std Ages
Adult
Older Adult
Maximum Age Number (converted to Years and rounded down)
999
Minimum Age Number (converted to Years and rounded down)
18
Investigators
Investigator Type
Principal Investigator
Investigator Name
Robert Michler
Investigator Email
RMICHLER@MONTEFIORE.ORG
Investigator Phone
rmichler
Categories Mesh Debug
Heart/Cardiovascular --- HEART VALVE DISEASES
Brain, Spinal Cord & Nervous System --- HEART DISEASES
Heart/Cardiovascular --- HEART DISEASES
Blood Disorders --- CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Blood & Bone Marrow Cancers --- CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Heart/Cardiovascular --- CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
MeSH Terms
AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS
AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY
AORTIC VALVE DISEASE
HEART VALVE DISEASES
HEART DISEASES
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW OBSTRUCTION